Writ of Superintending Control. The judges (Sygn. akt III APz 21/07 and VI P 68/06) do not have the courage to make the right decision based on the undisputed pleadings and exhibits presented for the record without any need for a trial. Their very wrong decisions were made only on the basis of false statements of the AMU perjurers. A gross miscarriage of justice occurred by the erroneous ruling of a lower court. The District Court of Law in Poznan, Poland is acting within its jurisdiction but is making mistakes of law and is acting in willful disregard for both the law and the incontrovertible evidence – the material facts of the case (e.g. commonly known facts). Under the Polish Constitution in Article 73 teaching, research, and publication liberties are assured. Under Article 23 such a type of personality rights as scientific output and other personal and private data are protected in civil law jurisdictions. Both articles are contravened and the plaintiff good name and image besmirched by such actions. For this reason, an appeal cannot provide adequate relief. The application from the Plaintiff to re-open the Appeal of June 25, 2007 or Writ of Superintending Control must be issued. Bad judges exist and they do not adhere to their oath of office. Judges are not above the law. How to deal with a bad judge? More extensive and vigorous efforts are needed to redress the balance. Punitive damages must be imposed to compensate the Plaintiff for mental anguish, shame, degradation, and other aggravations beyond actual damages.
Connect With Me on Social Media (personal presentation):
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jjspychala#, Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jjspychala, Follow me on GooglePlus: https://plus.google.com/102718395711018945430/about, Follow me on SkillPages: http://skillpages.com/jaroslaw.spychala, Follow me on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jaroslaw-spychala/5a/a7a/9b8, Follow me on Biowebspin: http://www.biowebspin.com/members/jjspychala1/.